Search the blog

25 Mar 2009

Abigail's trip to Qatar









Abigail Harrison Moore and Mariam Al Mulla, a doctoral candidate in the School and and a curator in the Qatar Museum Authority have recently visited Qatar to explore possible links and collaborations for art gallery and museum studies at Leeds. Mariam is currently in the second year of her PhD and is writing about the development of a museum culture in the country, having worked at the National Museum of Qatar before it was closed for renovations. Her most recent writing has focused on the opening of the Museum of Islamic Art in Doha, and the trip afforded the opportunity for Mariam to introduce Abigail to the amazing new building designed by I.M. Pei, the architect of the Louvre pyramid in Paris, and the opening exhibitions.
We are currently witnessing the rapid development of a museums culture across the Gulf and specifically in Qatar. Michael Rice, who worked at the Qatar National Museum between 1972 to 1974, recalls the attitude to history and heritage amongst the young in Qatar at that time:
We noticed that the local kids were coming in to the newly built museum building in the evenings and copying down the extensive texts there. We found out that they had been told by their teachers, who weren’t local, that they had no history-but because of the museum they realised that they did have a history and they responded. When the museum opened, they brought their parents and grandparents.
The last few years have seen a complete reversal of this attitude amongst the educators and leaders in Qatar. As Sheikha Al-Mayassa recently said in her conference paper ‘Qatar-centre of Middle East Museums’ at the Fourth Conference for Finance and Investment in London;
We in Qatar [wish]…to gain a regional and global reputation as an example of a community whose basic economy depends on variety and knowledge.
In order to emphasis the role that culture and museums can play in the economic and social development of the country, she added;
Civilizations all over the world agree on one point that ‘culture’ is not affected by the vacillation of the prices or the market’s cycle or the universal economic situation. Rather in most examples culture is considered as a powerful mover in economic development. It also plays a fundamental role in creating labour opportunities and provides an important source of national income.
These quotes illustrate how significant the funding of museum development has become for Qatar’s leaders. They are seen as vital for both the Qatari communities’ sense of its own heritage and its global identity. Lord Rothschild, a trustee on the Qatar National Museum Board emphasised this point when he announced that,
The Museum of Islamic Art is a profound expression of responsibility toward Qatar’s own heritage. The creation of the museum speaks of a laudable desire to preserve and honour the artistic traditions that are closest to Qatar’s own people.
Rather than being a museum, the Museum of Islamic Art is a place to learn and a platform for dialogue, as it will develop a productive relationship with some universally developed institutions such as the British Museum.
The Museum of Islamic Art, which opened on 22 November 2008 with great ceremony, and which has seen over thirty thousand visitors pass through its monumental doors since that date, is the first of a series of new and revamped museums planned for Qatar. The Qatar Museum Authority has produced a six-year plan under the title ‘21st Century Museums’, due for completion in 2012. During this period eight museums will be commissioned, new institutions such as the Islamic Art Museum(2008), the History of Education Museum(2010), the Natural History Museum(2012), the Science Museum(2012) and the Islamic Medicine Museum(2012), and renovated and reorganized museums, such as the Qatar National Museum(2011), the Oriental Arts and Photography Museum(2011) and the Weaponry and Equestrian Museum(2012). These museums have an ambitious remit, both to return and protect Qatari treasures;
With the oil boom and its resulting of economic fortune for the country, Qatar has had the opportunity to invest this fortune in the culture sector. This fortune allows the government to retrieve for Qatar the Islamic treasures, antiquities and archaeological pieces which belong to the civilization and had been taken abroad hundreds of years ago. Even if double their original price was paid, it was of paramount importance, that these artefacts were brought back to their original cultural field.
Such a grand plan highlights the need for students and researchers in museum studies to engage in the history, philosophy and practice of museums in the Gulf. This is an area which is under researched and theorised and we can usefully apply some of the post-colonial debates of the last few years to the region. There are also questions to be asked about the role of religion in museums and the role of the museum in political debates and in changing attitudes. The opening temporary exhibition at the IAM focuses on bringing together objects from the country’s collections with objects borrowed from decorative art collections across the globe, including the British Museum and the Metropolitan Museum of Art. In creating dialogues between these objects within the theme of ‘Crossing Boundaries’ the Museum aims to question how Islamic objects can be read through other religious ideas and ideals. This is an interesting starting point for the Museum which Mariam is investigating further in her work. She will be giving a lecture in the near future at Leeds on this project and Abigail is returning to Qatar at the request of Qatar University to deliver lectures on museum studies, a very new subject for the curriculum there, and to look at further research and teaching links between the two Universities. Mariam is the first student to be working on a thesis on the museums culture in Qatar and this is a rich, under-investigated area of study for the School.

17 Mar 2009

Who needs objects?

Not the Neues Museum. Forget the 'Museum Without Walls', this is the museum with only walls (for now). As G2 reported on Monday,  35,000 visitors came to see the restored shell of the museum over 3 days. Similar in some ways to what the curator of Temple Newsam (who spoke to us County House Collections lot last week) described in the early years of the building being open to the public, with very little inside after the house sales dispersed the collection. I suppose in this instance, there might be a potent sense of re-occupation and of reclaiming, but it's a poetic image. I suppose the real question is, are you still visiting a museum if there's nothing in it?

 

16 Mar 2009

A new way of looking...

AA Gill describes it as "the Mad Max vision of the Counter-Reformation".  "A crusade of cleansing". "A visual war". What can he be describing? How are we interpreting or representing a major cultural event?

Dumbing up, or a new 'experience'? The O2

The British Music Experience opens at the O2 arena, at a cost of £9.5M.
Is this the future of the visitor experience? Or a bit of disposable pop culture? Having said that, for the collectors of the cultural 'disposable' pop (ephemera?) culture is now big business, and most likely the exhibits of tomorrow.

Should we look at our museum and gallery displays, and consider their representation of cultural progression? Do they actually help us to understand how we got to where we are now? Or are they locked in time, and therefore largely irrelevant to contemporary (and young) visitors in the 21st century?

In considering whether "museums have become our home from home?" the works of Ray Oldenburg ("Celebrating the third place") are perhaps worth visiting.

14 Mar 2009

Dumbing Up?

How nice of Hugo Rifkind to write about museum audiences for us. Have a look at the article here.

13 Mar 2009

Nothing Happened (again)

In case you are not aware of Gavin Turk's 'Blue Plaque' (thanks Rebecca!...see the 'Comments' in the previous blog entry...)..here's a Tate Podcast about it (and other things)
http://www.tate.org.uk/onlineevents/webcasts/gavin_turk/default.jsp

mark

Manchester...Nothing happened?

Hello All,
we all had a trip to Manchester the other week, (during Reading Week...and lots of undergards and postgrads came along...now that's dedication!) Anyway, we had our usual whistle-stop tour of museums and galleries, including Manchester Art Gallery...with it's 19th century plaster casts of the Elgin-Parthenon metopes...which raised contentious debate about the place/role of such historical 'treasures' in British and Greek culture.....(cultural property...along with taxidermy...seems to be a recurrent theme in the Blog lately...)

.....anyway, we also attended a really interesting seminar with Dr Sam Alberti (of Manchester Museum/University) on 'Displaying the Dead in 19th century Manchester'...a fascinating (and amusing talk)..thanks Sam!
http://www.arts.manchester.ac.uk/museology/academicstaff/DrSamAlberti/
We also took a little wander round Manchester, mainly to look at, (contemplate?) a significant historical 'site'...The location of the (in)famous 'Peterloo Massacre' of
1819....shown here .....some of us got a little emotional (history can be such an emotive subject...don't you think?).........
(here's the Students pretending to be interested in the 'Peterloo' plaque at the Free Trade Hall in Peter Street, Manchester)
...
...anyway, after returning from Manchester, I mentioned this experience to Mrs M., and she pointed out this amusing photograph (from the Daily Mail...Mrs M tells me she only buys it for the crossword.....!) ....I thought it's a bit clunky, but raises some really important issues in relation to how we 'commemorate' (is that the right word?) historical moments, and the role that these 'plaques' play in constructing and shaping our memory and our identities.....maybe nothing did happen at 'Peterloo' in 1819?
Mark

8 Mar 2009

Daft Taxidermy

Hi All,

Rebecca's excellent suggestion prompts me to post this for the 'Daft Taxidermy' thread. 'Put 'em Up!' It's from the Natural History Museum, New York...now that's pretty daft!

(I resisted posting a pic of DD...he's not in a 'proper' museum anyway, and actually I don't think he's so daft...)

Mark

7 Mar 2009

More Gore



After seeing how sensitive Manchester Museum is to the debates surrounding the display of human remains, it was interesting to observe a very different strategy at York Museum. Human skulls are used in two exhibitions, one dealing with how objects are dated and the other about the Roman inhabitants of the area. Temporal distance and interpretation that makes the subject object seems to work against the kinds of re-sensitizing manoeuvres employed by Manchester. Perhaps this will change after the Museum closes for refurbishment later this year as the collection is reassessed. I don't feel able to offer a judgement as to which is more ethically sound, although I tend to agree that discomfort and provocation have their places in a museum context.

York Museum also takes this week's prize for daft taxidermy. I hope this becomes a regular feature.


2 Mar 2009

Perspectives on the Art Market

Hello everyone!

Following Matthew Kieran's discussion 'The Fragility of Aesthetic Knowledge: Psychology, Experience, and Artistic Appreciation’ as part of the 'Perspectives on the Art Market' series, I thought this might be an interesting link. Some issues around the change in perceptions of contemporary art over recent years begin to be addressed here...

http://www.axisweb.org/atATCL.aspx?AID=755